Cricket’s own governing body, the International Cricket Council (ICC), could not have imagined that this 2019 World Cup would end well. If we talk about this exciting 2019 World Cup final, it will live up to its name in the coming years as no team has lost in the final, only one team has won the World Cup and many cricket fans are bothered by the rules of the ICC.
1. Super communication:
What are the chances that the World Cup final will end in the final? And then the super over also ended in a draw?
The World Cup final between England and New Zealand was just the finishing touch to determine the winner of the tournament. As per current ICC rules, in the event of a draw in a Super Over, the team that reaches the highest limit wins the tournament. It’s like a team winning the World Cup based on possession after a penalty that ended in a draw.
After the match, New Zealand captain Kane Williamson admitted the rules were “hard to accept” when deciding the World Cup winners. Former Indian cricketer Gautam Gambhir was harsh in his criticism and called the ICC rules ridiculous.
2. Discard the bat or bat body.
While runs hit have been the highlight of many exciting matches in history, Ben Stokes’ hitting the boundaries resulting in six runs will be talked about for generations to come, even as Stokes quickly apologized for an unintentional mistake that he did not could have made. , the jury was still out. whether the umpires should award 5 or 6 runs for that fateful finish; It is time for the ICC to put an end to this controversial rule.
3. Slow signals
Since there is no strict logic behind the simple symbol, this rule is strange. Soft signals were introduced for controversial arrests because the CCTV footage was deemed to cast doubt on what was considered a clean arrest, so juries in the field make the decision in the first place; However, what made this signal so easy for the sport was the players’ immediate response to save the escape. , difficult without conclusive evidence. This is where the indoor TV referee can certainly come into play, as he can make more of a catch within the confines of the camera angle than an on-field referee watching the action from 7.5 meters away.
4. There is no ball on the field
Field umpires have a tough job. Referee throughout the game, ensure play is conducted within the Laws of the Game, identify the line and length of any ball that may be called LBW, and call free kicks and no balls. Although umpires now have the technology to make run decisions, LBW decisions and even close catch decisions, the technology needs to be overhauled as soon as possible to avoid prejudging the umpire’s decision. In the current situation, the on-field referee and the television referee only verify whether the ball is legal when it is awarded. While this is a good step to reduce mistakes, ball breaks often determine the fate of the game. An example of this occurred between Royal Challengers Bangalore and Mumbai Indians where the umpire failed to detect Lasith Malinga’s ball, giving the bowling team the win.
It is time to let the TV referee control the ball without the front foot, not only to reduce the burden on the referee on the field, but also to ensure that small differences will cause fewer errors in the game.
5. DRS dead ball rule
So this scenario has not happened in any game so far, but online cricket fans have been talking about it for a long time. Let me tell you this: Since the score is level in a super over, a batsman needs just one run to win the match from the last ball. The ball hits the man’s waist, deflects into the empty microbe area and the batsman runs to dislodge the leg. The bowling team is impressed and the umpire gives the batsman LBW, who then challenges him to review. If the DRS rules in favour of the batsman, will the batsman win?
No. Because DRS rules state that once the referee makes a decision, the ball is considered dead. Therefore, an incorrect decision on the DRS in this case will lead to a loss of legal credibility. It is time for the ACC to be proactive about this legislation as this could be an issue. Dear ICC, you have been warned. Lordsexch the Best Online betting id provider in India
